Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 12 Feb 2026, 15:35 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerTom Lonsdale
Score0–4
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictTom Lonsdale won 0–4. The result was driven by a 6.7 point 3-dart average edge for Tom Lonsdale; a 40.0 percentage point checkout edge for Tom Lonsdale.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayJamie HughesTom Lonsdale
74.5
3-dart averageTom Lonsdale edge
81.2
65.3
First 9 averageTom Lonsdale edge
98.5
0.0%
Checkout %Tom Lonsdale edge
40.0%
2
100+Tom Lonsdale edge
6
2
140+Jamie Hughes edge
1
1
180sJamie Hughes edge
0
0
Highest checkoutTom Lonsdale edge
116
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityTom Lonsdale created the cleaner scoring base with a 6.7 point edge in 3-dart average.
Tom Lonsdale was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 40.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Tom Lonsdale set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 33.3 point First 9 advantage.
Lonsdale T. took the final leg in 17 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsLonsdale T. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 17 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg74.5
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 2 / 2
Checkout %0.0%
Highest checkout0
Checkouts0/3
3-dart avg81.2
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 1 / 6
Checkout %40.0%
Highest checkout116
Checkouts4/10
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Lonsdale T.
L2Lonsdale T.
L3Lonsdale T.
L4Lonsdale T.
Leg-by-leg table
4 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Lonsdale T.
22
40
Set 1 · Leg 2
Lonsdale T.
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 3
Lonsdale T.
15Fast leg
116
Set 1 · Leg 4
Lonsdale T.
17
56
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits4 / 50
Sourceexplicit
