Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityPeter Wright was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 37.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Noa-Lynn van Leuven set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 3.0 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumePeter WrightNoa-Lynn van Leuven Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionPeter WrightCheckout %56.0%
Highest checkout152
Checkouts9/16
Noa-Lynn van LeuvenCheckout %19.0%
Highest checkout108
Checkouts3/16
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Peter Wright
L2Peter Wright
L3Noa-Lynn van Leuven
L4Peter Wright
L5Peter Wright
L6Noa-Lynn van Leuven
L7Peter Wright
L8Noa-Lynn van Leuven
L9Peter Wright
L10Peter Wright
L11Peter Wright
L12Peter Wright
Leg-by-leg table
12 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Peter Wright
17
66
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Peter Wright
15Fast leg
152
Set 1 · Leg 3
Noa-Lynn van Leuven
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 4
Peter Wright
17
53
Set 2 · Leg 1Streak of 2
Peter Wright
19
40
Set 2 · Leg 2
Noa-Lynn van Leuven
15Fast leg
108
Set 2 · Leg 3
Peter Wright
17
75
Set 2 · Leg 4
Noa-Lynn van Leuven
13Fast leg
40
Set 2 · Leg 5
Peter Wright
16
38
Set 3 · Leg 1Streak of 2
Peter Wright
22
32
Set 3 · Leg 2Streak of 3
Peter Wright
16
20
Set 3 · Leg 3Streak of 4
Peter Wright
14Fast leg
66
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg83.5
First 988.1
Checkout56.0% (9/16)
180s2
High checkout152
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg82.9
First 991.1
Checkout19.0% (3/16)
180s4
High checkout108
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressPeter Wright closed this out 9–3, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.