Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityDawson Murschell was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 11.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Dawson Murschell set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 5.5 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeDawson MurschellJack Smith Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionDawson MurschellCheckout %33.0%
Highest checkout18
Checkouts4/12
Jack SmithCheckout %22.0%
Highest checkout48
Checkouts2/9
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Dawson Murschell
L2Jack Smith
L3Dawson Murschell
L4Dawson Murschell
L5Jack Smith
L6Dawson Murschell
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Dawson Murschell
16
18
Set 1 · Leg 2
Jack Smith
16
16
Set 1 · Leg 3
Dawson Murschell
16
16
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 2
Dawson Murschell
20
5
Set 1 · Leg 5
Jack Smith
17
48
Set 1 · Leg 6
Dawson Murschell
13Fast leg
16
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg84.6
First 9102.2
Checkout33.0% (4/12)
180s1
High checkout18
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg83.9
First 996.7
Checkout22.0% (2/9)
180s2
High checkout48
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressThe edge missed. The simplest culprit is finishing: Dawson Murschell outperformed on doubles, which is often enough to flip a match even when the original pre-match lean looked reasonable. Final score: 4–2.