180s1
140+2
100+12
Completed Match
Full breakdown modeModus Super Series • 27 Apr 2026, 12:29 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerJeff Smith
Score4–3
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Post-match readDaniel Baggish leads in form 3DA by 4.6 points and first nine average by 9.6 points, establishing a clear advantage in scoring consistency. The lean favors Daniel Baggish based on these significant edges despite limited head-to-head data.
Edge result
Pre-match lean was on the wrong sideEdge missed
The pre-match model leaned the other way, so the post-match read now needs to explain what performance gap broke the original setup.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitJeff Smith avg89.9
Daniel Baggish avg96.1
Jeff Smith checkout44.0%
Daniel Baggish checkout50.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedJeff SmithDaniel Baggish
89.9
3-dart averageDaniel Baggish edge
96.1
102
First 9 averageJeff Smith edge
100.5
44.0%
Checkout %Daniel Baggish edge
50.0%
12
100+Level
12
2
140+Daniel Baggish edge
4
1
180sLevel
1
102
Highest checkoutJeff Smith edge
40
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityDaniel Baggish created the cleaner scoring base with a 6.2 point edge in 3-dart average.
Daniel Baggish was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 6.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s1
140+4
100+12
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %44.0%
Highest checkout102
Checkouts4/9
Checkout %50.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts3/6
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Daniel Baggish
L2Daniel Baggish
L3Jeff Smith
L4Daniel Baggish
L5Jeff Smith
L6Jeff Smith
L7Jeff Smith
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Daniel Baggish
13Fast leg
30
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Daniel Baggish
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 3
Jeff Smith
15Fast leg
102
Set 1 · Leg 4
Daniel Baggish
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 5
Jeff Smith
16
16
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Jeff Smith
17
65
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 3
Jeff Smith
16
6
Match stats
2 player rowsJeff Smith
3-dart avg89.9
First 9102
Checkout44.0% (4/9)
180s1
High checkout102
100+ checkouts1
Daniel Baggish
3-dart avg96.1
First 9100.5
Checkout50.0% (3/6)
180s1
High checkout40
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressThe edge missed. The simplest culprit is finishing: Daniel Baggish outperformed on doubles, which is often enough to flip a match even when the original pre-match lean looked reasonable. Final score: 4–3.