180s2
140+5
100+8
Completed Match
Full breakdown modeModus Super Series • 6 Feb 2026, 14:25 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerScott Campbell
Score3–4
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Awaiting recap signalThis match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.
Edge result
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitTommy Lishman avg79.2
Scott Campbell avg80.2
Tommy Lishman checkout15.0%
Scott Campbell checkout16.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedTommy LishmanScott Campbell
79.2
3-dart averageScott Campbell edge
80.2
98.3
First 9 averageTommy Lishman edge
97.3
15.0%
Checkout %Scott Campbell edge
16.0%
8
100+Tommy Lishman edge
4
5
140+Tommy Lishman edge
4
2
180sScott Campbell edge
5
40
Highest checkoutScott Campbell edge
144
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityThe final stat split is relatively tight, so the fuller leg-by-leg context matters more than one obvious blowout metric.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s5
140+4
100+4
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %15.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts3/20
Checkout %16.0%
Highest checkout144
Checkouts4/25
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Lishman T.
L2Campbell S.
L3Lishman T.
L4Lishman T.
L5Campbell S.
L6Campbell S.
L7Campbell S.
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Lishman T.
22
40
Set 1 · Leg 2
Campbell S.
17
58
Set 1 · Leg 3
Lishman T.
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 4
Lishman T.
22
8
Set 1 · Leg 5
Campbell S.
16
20
Set 1 · Leg 6
Campbell S.
15Fast leg
144
Set 1 · Leg 7
Campbell S.
16
4
Match stats
2 player rowsLishman T.
3-dart avg79.2
First 998.3
Checkout15.0% (3/20)
180s2
High checkout40
100+ checkouts0
Campbell S.
3-dart avg80.2
First 997.3
Checkout16.0% (4/25)
180s5
High checkout144
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressScott Campbell closed this out 3–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.