Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 5 Feb 2026, 16:15 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerLewis Gurney
Score2–4
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictLewis Gurney won 2–4. The result was driven by a 13.9 point 3-dart average edge for Lewis Gurney; a 9.0 percentage point checkout edge for Aaron Gill.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayAaron GillLewis Gurney
74.7
3-dart averageLewis Gurney edge
88.6
74.9
First 9 averageLewis Gurney edge
100.6
40.0%
Checkout %Aaron Gill edge
31.0%
4
100+Lewis Gurney edge
6
5
140+Lewis Gurney edge
6
0
180sLewis Gurney edge
1
18
Highest checkoutLewis Gurney edge
126
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityLewis Gurney created the cleaner scoring base with a 13.9 point edge in 3-dart average.
Aaron Gill was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 9.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Lewis Gurney set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 25.7 point First 9 advantage.
Gurney L. took the final leg in 14 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsGurney L. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 14 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg74.7
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 5 / 4
Checkout %40.0%
Highest checkout18
Checkouts2/5
3-dart avg88.6
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 6 / 6
Checkout %31.0%
Highest checkout126
Checkouts4/13
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Gill A.
L2Gurney L.
L3Gurney L.
L4Gurney L.
L5Gill A.
L6Gurney L.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Gill A.
19
10
Set 1 · Leg 2
Gurney L.
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 3
Gurney L.
15Fast leg
126
Set 1 · Leg 4
Gurney L.
19
32
Set 1 · Leg 5
Gill A.
16
18
Set 1 · Leg 6
Gurney L.
14Fast leg
65
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 69
Sourceexplicit
