Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityKim Huybrechts was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 22.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Dirk van Duijvenbode set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 4.8 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeDirk van DuijvenbodeKim Huybrechts Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionDirk van DuijvenbodeCheckout %33.0%
Highest checkout56
Checkouts3/9
Kim HuybrechtsCheckout %55.0%
Highest checkout87
Checkouts6/11
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Kim Huybrechts
L2Kim Huybrechts
L3Dirk van Duijvenbode
L4Kim Huybrechts
L5Dirk van Duijvenbode
L6Kim Huybrechts
L7Dirk van Duijvenbode
L8Kim Huybrechts
L9Kim Huybrechts
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Kim Huybrechts
15Fast leg
87
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Kim Huybrechts
19
32
Set 1 · Leg 3
Dirk van Duijvenbode
13Fast leg
16
Set 1 · Leg 4
Kim Huybrechts
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 5
Dirk van Duijvenbode
14Fast leg
56
Set 1 · Leg 6
Kim Huybrechts
14Fast leg
56
Set 1 · Leg 7
Dirk van Duijvenbode
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 8
Kim Huybrechts
14Fast leg
62
Set 1 · Leg 9Streak of 2
Kim Huybrechts
14Fast leg
75
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg94.7
First 9103.9
Checkout33.0% (3/9)
180s3
High checkout56
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg93.8
First 999.1
Checkout55.0% (6/11)
180s2
High checkout87
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressThe edge missed. The simplest culprit is finishing: Kim Huybrechts outperformed on doubles, which is often enough to flip a match even when the original pre-match lean looked reasonable. Final score: 3–6.