Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityNathan Potter created the cleaner scoring base with a 13.8 point edge in 3-dart average.
Nathan Potter was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 67.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeFinishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionSteve GreenCheckout %0.0%
Highest checkout0
Checkouts0/5
Nathan PotterCheckout %67.0%
Highest checkout142
Checkouts4/6
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Nathan Potter
L2Nathan Potter
L3Nathan Potter
L4Nathan Potter
Leg-by-leg table
4 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Nathan Potter
15Fast leg
116
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Nathan Potter
16
32
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 3
Nathan Potter
15Fast leg
142
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 4
Nathan Potter
22
20
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg74.6
First 991.5
Checkout0.0% (0/5)
180s0
High checkout0
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg88.4
First 992
Checkout67.0% (4/6)
180s0
High checkout142
100+ checkouts2
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressThe edge missed. The simplest culprit is finishing: Nathan Potter outperformed on doubles, which is often enough to flip a match even when the original pre-match lean looked reasonable. Final score: 0–4.