Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilitySteve Green was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 57.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Graham Hall set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 11.8 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeFinishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionSteve GreenCheckout %100.0%
Highest checkout128
Checkouts4/4
Graham HallCheckout %43.0%
Highest checkout65
Checkouts3/7
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Steve Green
L2Graham Hall
L3Steve Green
L4Graham Hall
L5Steve Green
L6Graham Hall
L7Steve Green
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Steve Green
18
128
Set 1 · Leg 2
Graham Hall
14Fast leg
65
Set 1 · Leg 3
Steve Green
18
92
Set 1 · Leg 4
Graham Hall
16
32
Set 1 · Leg 5
Steve Green
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 6
Graham Hall
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 7
Steve Green
17
60
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg86.5
First 981.6
Checkout100.0% (4/4)
180s0
High checkout128
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg87.2
First 993.4
Checkout43.0% (3/7)
180s0
High checkout65
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressThe edge missed. The simplest culprit is finishing: Steve Green outperformed on doubles, which is often enough to flip a match even when the original pre-match lean looked reasonable. Final score: 4–3.