Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityNathan Potter created the cleaner scoring base with a 4.5 point edge in 3-dart average.
Nathan Potter set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 6.5 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeRadek SzaganskiNathan Potter Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionRadek SzaganskiCheckout %67.0%
Highest checkout100
Checkouts2/3
Nathan PotterCheckout %67.0%
Highest checkout111
Checkouts4/6
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Nathan Potter
L2Nathan Potter
L3Radek Szaganski
L4Nathan Potter
L5Radek Szaganski
L6Nathan Potter
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Nathan Potter
18
111
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Nathan Potter
17
60
Set 1 · Leg 3
Radek Szaganski
13Fast leg
24
Set 1 · Leg 4
Nathan Potter
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 5
Radek Szaganski
15Fast leg
100
Set 1 · Leg 6
Nathan Potter
16
24
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg84.9
First 986.2
Checkout67.0% (2/3)
180s0
High checkout100
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg89.4
First 992.7
Checkout67.0% (4/6)
180s0
High checkout111
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressThe edge missed. The simplest culprit is finishing: Nathan Potter outperformed on doubles, which is often enough to flip a match even when the original pre-match lean looked reasonable. Final score: 2–4.