DartsEdge

Completed Match

point-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcf98ad6da1c7ca647d133: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcf98ad6da1c7ca647d133: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.

Jeffrey De Zwaan

1–6

James Hurrell

Players Championship 9 2026 • Round of 64 • 13 Apr 2026, 14:05 UTC

WinnerJames Hurrell
Score1–6
Datapoint-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcf98ad6da1c7ca647d133: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcf98ad6da1c7ca647d133: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.

Why this match was won

Post-match verdict

James Hurrell won 1–6. The result was driven by a 9.1 point 3-dart average edge for James Hurrell; a 35.0 percentage point checkout edge for James Hurrell.

Average gap9.1 ptsJames Hurrell led the 3-dart average.
Checkout gap35.0 ptsJames Hurrell finished cleaner on doubles.
Leg flowNo runNo leg-by-leg run stood out.
Pre-match edgeNo clean edgePrediction unavailable

Pre-match edge post-mortem

Prediction unavailable
No clean edge

There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.

Match comparison

One table, no stat-card cosplay
Jeffrey De ZwaanJames Hurrell
92.2
3-dart averageJames Hurrell edge
101.3
95.1
First 9 averageJames Hurrell edge
112.3
20.0%
Checkout %James Hurrell edge
55.0%
8
100+James Hurrell edge
10
6
140+Level
6
1
180sJames Hurrell edge
3
0
Highest checkoutLevel
0

Performance insights

Driven by match-level stats only
James Hurrell created the cleaner scoring base with a 9.1 point edge in 3-dart average.
James Hurrell was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 35.0 percentage points better on doubles.
James Hurrell set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 17.2 point First 9 advantage.

Scoring and finishing

Volume plus conversion
Jeffrey De Zwaan
3-dart avg92.2
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 6 / 8
Checkout %20.0%
Highest checkout0
James Hurrell
3-dart avg101.3
180s / 140+ / 100+3 / 6 / 10
Checkout %55.0%
Highest checkout0

Data coverage

Source and completeness
Coveragepoint-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcf98ad6da1c7ca647d133: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcf98ad6da1c7ca647d133: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.
Stats rows2
Legs / visits0 / 0
Sourcematch_stats_only

point-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcf98ad6da1c7ca647d133: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcf98ad6da1c7ca647d133: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.