Completed Match

point-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dced68d6da1c7ca647cc1d: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dced68d6da1c7ca647cc1d: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.

Players Championship 9 2026 • Round of 128 • 13 Apr 2026, 13:15 UTC

WinnerMax Hopp
Score4–6
Datapoint-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dced68d6da1c7ca647cc1d: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dced68d6da1c7ca647cc1d: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.

Why this match was won

Post-match verdict

Max Hopp won 4–6. The result was driven by a 14.4 point 3-dart average edge for Max Hopp; a 5.0 percentage point checkout edge for Max Hopp.

Average gap14.4 ptsMax Hopp led the 3-dart average.
Checkout gap5.0 ptsMax Hopp finished cleaner on doubles.
Leg flowNo runNo leg-by-leg run stood out.
Pre-match edgeNo clean edgePrediction unavailable

Pre-match edge post-mortem

Prediction unavailable
No clean edge

There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.

Match comparison

One table, no stat-card cosplay
Adam PaxtonMax Hopp
81.4
3-dart averageMax Hopp edge
95.8
86.7
First 9 averageMax Hopp edge
102.9
33.0%
Checkout %Max Hopp edge
38.0%
15
100+Adam Paxton edge
12
7
140+Max Hopp edge
10
1
180sMax Hopp edge
4
0
Highest checkoutLevel
0

Performance insights

Driven by match-level stats only
Max Hopp created the cleaner scoring base with a 14.4 point edge in 3-dart average.
Max Hopp was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 5.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Max Hopp set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 16.3 point First 9 advantage.

Scoring and finishing

Volume plus conversion
Adam Paxton
3-dart avg81.4
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 7 / 15
Checkout %33.0%
Highest checkout0
Max Hopp
3-dart avg95.8
180s / 140+ / 100+4 / 10 / 12
Checkout %38.0%
Highest checkout0

Data coverage

Source and completeness
Coveragepoint-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dced68d6da1c7ca647cc1d: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dced68d6da1c7ca647cc1d: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.
Stats rows2
Legs / visits0 / 0
Sourcematch_stats_only

point-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dced68d6da1c7ca647cc1d: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dced68d6da1c7ca647cc1d: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.