DartsEdge

Completed Match

point-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcea60d6da1c7ca647cad8: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcea60d6da1c7ca647cad8: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.

Adam Lipscombe

6–2

Jeffrey De Graaf

Players Championship 9 2026 • Round of 128 • 13 Apr 2026, 13:15 UTC

WinnerAdam Lipscombe
Score6–2
Datapoint-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcea60d6da1c7ca647cad8: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcea60d6da1c7ca647cad8: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.

Why this match was won

Post-match verdict

Adam Lipscombe won 6–2. The result was driven by a 2.5 point 3-dart average edge for Jeffrey De Graaf; a 16.0 percentage point checkout edge for Adam Lipscombe.

Average gap2.5 ptsJeffrey De Graaf led the 3-dart average.
Checkout gap16.0 ptsAdam Lipscombe finished cleaner on doubles.
Leg flowNo runNo leg-by-leg run stood out.
Pre-match edgeNo clean edgePrediction unavailable

Pre-match edge post-mortem

Prediction unavailable
No clean edge

There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.

Match comparison

One table, no stat-card cosplay
Adam LipscombeJeffrey De Graaf
86.3
3-dart averageJeffrey De Graaf edge
88.8
97.7
First 9 averageAdam Lipscombe edge
92.3
38.0%
Checkout %Adam Lipscombe edge
22.0%
14
100+Adam Lipscombe edge
10
6
140+Jeffrey De Graaf edge
7
2
180sLevel
2
0
Highest checkoutLevel
0

Performance insights

Driven by match-level stats only
Jeffrey De Graaf created the cleaner scoring base with a 2.5 point edge in 3-dart average.
Adam Lipscombe was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 16.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Adam Lipscombe set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 5.4 point First 9 advantage.

Scoring and finishing

Volume plus conversion
Adam Lipscombe
3-dart avg86.3
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 6 / 14
Checkout %38.0%
Highest checkout0
Jeffrey De Graaf
3-dart avg88.8
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 7 / 10
Checkout %22.0%
Highest checkout0

Data coverage

Source and completeness
Coveragepoint-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcea60d6da1c7ca647cad8: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcea60d6da1c7ca647cad8: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.
Stats rows2
Legs / visits0 / 0
Sourcematch_stats_only

point-by-point unavailable | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcea60d6da1c7ca647cad8: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout. | DartConnect enrichment 2026-04-14 from recap 69dcea60d6da1c7ca647cad8: populated 3DA, First 9, checkout efficiency/opportunities, 100+/140+/180, and highest checkout.