Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 5 Feb 2026, 14:25 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerAaron Gill
Score2–4
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictAaron Gill won 2–4. The result was driven by a 1.5 point 3-dart average edge for Lars Erik Lindgreen; a 13.0 percentage point checkout edge for Aaron Gill.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayLars Erik LindgreenAaron Gill
76.6
3-dart averageLars Erik Lindgreen edge
75.1
78.3
First 9 averageAaron Gill edge
88.8
18.0%
Checkout %Aaron Gill edge
31.0%
8
100+Level
8
2
140+Level
2
0
180sLevel
0
40
Highest checkoutLevel
40
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityLars Erik Lindgreen created the cleaner scoring base with a 1.5 point edge in 3-dart average.
Aaron Gill was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 13.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Aaron Gill set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 10.5 point First 9 advantage.
Gill A. took the final leg in 19 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsGill A. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 19 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg76.6
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 2 / 8
Checkout %18.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts2/11
3-dart avg75.1
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 2 / 8
Checkout %31.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts4/13
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Lindgreen L.
L2Gill A.
L3Gill A.
L4Gill A.
L5Lindgreen L.
L6Gill A.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Lindgreen L.
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 2
Gill A.
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 3
Gill A.
16
24
Set 1 · Leg 4
Gill A.
22
40
Set 1 · Leg 5
Lindgreen L.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 6
Gill A.
19
20
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 77
Sourceexplicit
