Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 4 Feb 2026, 12:20 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerPatrik Williams
Score2–4
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictPatrik Williams won 2–4. The result was driven by a 15.0 percentage point checkout edge for Patrik Williams.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayLars Erik LindgreenPatrik Williams
83
3-dart averageLars Erik Lindgreen edge
82.5
93.1
First 9 averagePatrik Williams edge
93.6
29.0%
Checkout %Patrik Williams edge
44.0%
6
100+Lars Erik Lindgreen edge
4
5
140+Lars Erik Lindgreen edge
3
0
180sPatrik Williams edge
2
100
Highest checkoutLars Erik Lindgreen edge
84
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityPatrik Williams was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 15.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Williams P. took the final leg in 16 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsWilliams P. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 16 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg83
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 5 / 6
Checkout %29.0%
Highest checkout100
Checkouts2/7
3-dart avg82.5
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 3 / 4
Checkout %44.0%
Highest checkout84
Checkouts4/9
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Williams P.
L2Williams P.
L3Lindgreen L.
L4Lindgreen L.
L5Williams P.
L6Williams P.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Williams P.
20
25
Set 1 · Leg 2
Williams P.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 3
Lindgreen L.
14Fast leg
46
Set 1 · Leg 4
Lindgreen L.
18
100
Set 1 · Leg 5
Williams P.
15Fast leg
84
Set 1 · Leg 6
Williams P.
16
40
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 67
Sourceexplicit
