Completed Match

Full leg data

Modus Super Series • 4 Feb 2026, 12:20 UTC • Best of 7 legs

WinnerPatrik Williams
Score2–4
DataFull leg data

Why this match was won

Post-match verdict

Patrik Williams won 2–4. The result was driven by a 15.0 percentage point checkout edge for Patrik Williams.

Average gap0.5 ptsLars Erik Lindgreen led the 3-dart average.
Checkout gap15.0 ptsPatrik Williams finished cleaner on doubles.
Leg flowNo runNo leg-by-leg run stood out.
Pre-match edgeNo clean edgePrediction unavailable

Pre-match edge post-mortem

Prediction unavailable
No clean edge

There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.

Match comparison

One table, no stat-card cosplay
Lars Erik LindgreenPatrik Williams
83
3-dart averageLars Erik Lindgreen edge
82.5
93.1
First 9 averagePatrik Williams edge
93.6
29.0%
Checkout %Patrik Williams edge
44.0%
6
100+Lars Erik Lindgreen edge
4
5
140+Lars Erik Lindgreen edge
3
0
180sPatrik Williams edge
2
100
Highest checkoutLars Erik Lindgreen edge
84

Key performance insights

Driven by the final stat split and leg availability
Patrik Williams was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 15.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Williams P. took the final leg in 16 darts, closing the match at 0–0.

Leg-flow story

Runs, breaks, and decisive legs
Williams P. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 16 darts.

Scoring and finishing

Volume plus conversion
Lars Erik Lindgreen
3-dart avg83
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 5 / 6
Checkout %29.0%
Highest checkout100
Checkouts2/7
Patrik Williams
3-dart avg82.5
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 3 / 4
Checkout %44.0%
Highest checkout84
Checkouts4/9

Momentum strip

Match flow by leg
L1Williams P.
L2Williams P.
L3Lindgreen L.
L4Lindgreen L.
L5Williams P.
L6Williams P.

Leg-by-leg table

6 legs captured
LegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Williams P.
20
25
Set 1 · Leg 2
Williams P.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 3
Lindgreen L.
14Fast leg
46
Set 1 · Leg 4
Lindgreen L.
18
100
Set 1 · Leg 5
Williams P.
15Fast leg
84
Set 1 · Leg 6
Williams P.
16
40

Data coverage

Source and completeness
CoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 67
Sourceexplicit