Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityPatrik Williams was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 15.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeLars Erik LindgreenPatrik Williams Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionLars Erik LindgreenCheckout %29.0%
Highest checkout100
Checkouts2/7
Patrik WilliamsCheckout %44.0%
Highest checkout84
Checkouts4/9
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Williams P.
L2Williams P.
L3Lindgreen L.
L4Lindgreen L.
L5Williams P.
L6Williams P.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Williams P.
20
25
Set 1 · Leg 2
Williams P.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 3
Lindgreen L.
14Fast leg
46
Set 1 · Leg 4
Lindgreen L.
18
100
Set 1 · Leg 5
Williams P.
15Fast leg
84
Set 1 · Leg 6
Williams P.
16
40
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg83
First 993.1
Checkout29.0% (2/7)
180s0
High checkout100
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg82.5
First 993.6
Checkout44.0% (4/9)
180s2
High checkout84
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressPatrik Williams closed this out 2–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.