180s0
140+2
100+2
Completed Match
Full breakdown modeModus Super Series • 9 Apr 2026, 23:53 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerDean Finn
Score0–4
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Awaiting recap signalThis match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.
Edge result
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitDmitrii Rogov avg67.3
Dean Finn avg72.4
Dmitrii Rogov checkout0.0%
Dean Finn checkout33.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedDmitrii RogovDean Finn
67.3
3-dart averageDean Finn edge
72.4
64.1
First 9 averageDean Finn edge
75.4
0.0%
Checkout %Dean Finn edge
33.0%
2
100+Dean Finn edge
4
2
140+Dmitrii Rogov edge
1
0
180sDean Finn edge
1
0
Highest checkoutDean Finn edge
71
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityDean Finn created the cleaner scoring base with a 5.1 point edge in 3-dart average.
Dean Finn was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 33.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Dean Finn set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 11.3 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s1
140+1
100+4
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %0.0%
Highest checkout0
Checkouts0/1
Checkout %33.0%
Highest checkout71
Checkouts4/12
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Dean Finn
L2Dean Finn
L3Dean Finn
L4Dean Finn
Leg-by-leg table
4 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Dean Finn
20
71
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Dean Finn
17
25
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 3
Dean Finn
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 4
Dean Finn
23
35
Match stats
2 player rowsDmitrii Rogov
3-dart avg67.3
First 964.1
Checkout0.0% (0/1)
180s0
High checkout0
100+ checkouts0
Dean Finn
3-dart avg72.4
First 975.4
Checkout33.0% (4/12)
180s1
High checkout71
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressDean Finn closed this out 0–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.