Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 23 Jan 2026, 23:05 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerLee Cocks
Score4–1
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictLee Cocks won 4–1. The result was driven by a 9.2 point 3-dart average edge for Lee Cocks; a 7.0 percentage point checkout edge for Lee Cocks.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayLee CocksJames Mcewan
93.4
3-dart averageLee Cocks edge
84.2
99.9
First 9 averageLee Cocks edge
89.1
57.0%
Checkout %Lee Cocks edge
50.0%
7
100+Lee Cocks edge
3
4
140+Lee Cocks edge
3
2
180sLee Cocks edge
1
105
Highest checkoutLee Cocks edge
40
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityLee Cocks created the cleaner scoring base with a 9.2 point edge in 3-dart average.
Lee Cocks was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 7.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Lee Cocks set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 10.8 point First 9 advantage.
Cocks L. took the final leg in 16 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsCocks L. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 16 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg93.4
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 4 / 7
Checkout %57.0%
Highest checkout105
Checkouts4/7
3-dart avg84.2
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 3 / 3
Checkout %50.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts1/2
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Cocks L.
L2McEwan J.
L3Cocks L.
L4Cocks L.
L5Cocks L.
Leg-by-leg table
5 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Cocks L.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 2
McEwan J.
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 3
Cocks L.
18
105
Set 1 · Leg 4
Cocks L.
14Fast leg
46
Set 1 · Leg 5
Cocks L.
16
8
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits5 / 52
Sourceexplicit