Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityStijn Deklerck was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 50.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Conan Whitehead set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 5.6 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeConan WhiteheadStijn Deklerck Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionConan WhiteheadCheckout %50.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts2/4
Stijn DeklerckCheckout %100.0%
Highest checkout141
Checkouts4/4
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Deklerck S.
L2Deklerck S.
L3Whitehead C.
L4Whitehead C.
L5Deklerck S.
L6Deklerck S.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Deklerck S.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 2
Deklerck S.
15Fast leg
141
Set 1 · Leg 3
Whitehead C.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 4
Whitehead C.
16
16
Set 1 · Leg 5
Deklerck S.
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 6
Deklerck S.
16
36
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg89.2
First 998.1
Checkout50.0% (2/4)
180s2
High checkout40
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg89.4
First 992.5
Checkout100.0% (4/4)
180s2
High checkout141
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressStijn Deklerck closed this out 2–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.