Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 22 Jan 2026, 14:50 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerConan Whitehead
Score4–2
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictConan Whitehead won 4–2. The result was driven by a 8.0 percentage point checkout edge for Conan Whitehead.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayConan WhiteheadTimothy Verbrugghe
72.6
3-dart averageTimothy Verbrugghe edge
73.2
93.3
First 9 averageConan Whitehead edge
74.9
19.0%
Checkout %Conan Whitehead edge
11.0%
7
100+Timothy Verbrugghe edge
8
2
140+Timothy Verbrugghe edge
3
1
180sLevel
1
104
Highest checkoutTimothy Verbrugghe edge
116
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityConan Whitehead was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 8.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Conan Whitehead set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 18.3 point First 9 advantage.
Whitehead C. took the final leg in 19 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsWhitehead C. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 19 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg72.6
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 2 / 7
Checkout %19.0%
Highest checkout104
Checkouts4/21
3-dart avg73.2
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 3 / 8
Checkout %11.0%
Highest checkout116
Checkouts2/19
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Verbrugghe T.
L2Verbrugghe T.
L3Whitehead C.
L4Whitehead C.
L5Whitehead C.
L6Whitehead C.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Verbrugghe T.
15Fast leg
116
Set 1 · Leg 2
Verbrugghe T.
20
64
Set 1 · Leg 3
Whitehead C.
18
104
Set 1 · Leg 4
Whitehead C.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 5
Whitehead C.
31
2
Set 1 · Leg 6
Whitehead C.
19
40
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 81
Sourceexplicit
