Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityConor Paterson was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 49.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Conor Paterson set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 3.5 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeScott WinderConor Paterson Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionScott WinderCheckout %18.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts3/17
Conor PatersonCheckout %67.0%
Highest checkout66
Checkouts4/6
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Winder S.
L2Paterson C.
L3Winder S.
L4Paterson C.
L5Winder S.
L6Paterson C.
L7Paterson C.
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Winder S.
19
8
Set 1 · Leg 2
Paterson C.
20
66
Set 1 · Leg 3
Winder S.
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 4
Paterson C.
16
20
Set 1 · Leg 5
Winder S.
19
36
Set 1 · Leg 6
Paterson C.
19
16
Set 1 · Leg 7
Paterson C.
20
60
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg76.4
First 975.4
Checkout18.0% (3/17)
180s0
High checkout40
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg76.9
First 978.9
Checkout67.0% (4/6)
180s1
High checkout66
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressConor Paterson closed this out 3–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.