Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 26 Mar 2026, 13:24 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerConor Paterson
Score4–3
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictConor Paterson won 4–3. The result was driven by a 11.0 percentage point checkout edge for Conor Paterson.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayConor PatersonZereso Zeverboom
65.1
3-dart averageZereso Zeverboom edge
65.2
78.2
First 9 averageConor Paterson edge
71.8
24.0%
Checkout %Conor Paterson edge
13.0%
8
100+Level
8
4
140+Conor Paterson edge
1
0
180sLevel
0
77
Highest checkoutConor Paterson edge
20
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityConor Paterson was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 11.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Conor Paterson set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 6.4 point First 9 advantage.
Paterson C. took the final leg in 25 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsPaterson C. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 25 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg65.1
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 4 / 8
Checkout %24.0%
Highest checkout77
Checkouts4/17
3-dart avg65.2
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 1 / 8
Checkout %13.0%
Highest checkout20
Checkouts3/23
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Zeverboom Z.
L2Paterson C.
L3Paterson C.
L4Zeverboom Z.
L5Paterson C.
L6Zeverboom Z.
L7Paterson C.
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Zeverboom Z.
22
20
Set 1 · Leg 2
Paterson C.
20
77
Set 1 · Leg 3
Paterson C.
17
58
Set 1 · Leg 4
Zeverboom Z.
19
16
Set 1 · Leg 5
Paterson C.
19
2
Set 1 · Leg 6
Zeverboom Z.
28
2
Set 1 · Leg 7
Paterson C.
25
40
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits7 / 103
Sourcefull_leg_data
