Why this match was won
Post-match verdictJoe Hunt won 4–1. The result was driven by a 12.5 point 3-dart average edge for Joe Hunt; a 7.0 percentage point checkout edge for Joe Hunt.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayJoe HuntAdam Hunt
103
3-dart averageJoe Hunt edge
90.6
112.1
First 9 averageJoe Hunt edge
99.3
57.0%
Checkout %Joe Hunt edge
50.0%
6
100+Joe Hunt edge
4
3
140+Joe Hunt edge
2
2
180sLevel
2
87
Highest checkoutJoe Hunt edge
20
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJoe Hunt created the cleaner scoring base with a 12.5 point edge in 3-dart average.
Joe Hunt was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 7.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Joe Hunt set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 12.8 point First 9 advantage.
Hunt J. took the final leg in 13 darts, closing the match at 0–1.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsHunt J. closed the final leg at 0–1 in 13 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg103
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 3 / 6
Checkout %57.0%
Highest checkout87
Checkouts4/7
3-dart avg90.6
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 2 / 4
Checkout %50.0%
Highest checkout20
Checkouts1/2
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Hunt J.
L2Hunt J.
L3Hunt J.
L4Adam Hunt
L5Hunt J.
Leg-by-leg table
5 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Hunt J.
11Fast leg
46
Set 1 · Leg 2
Hunt J.
15Fast leg
87
Set 1 · Leg 3
Hunt J.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 4
Adam Hunt
16
20
Set 1 · Leg 5
Hunt J.
13Fast leg
36
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits5 / 48
Sourcefull_leg_data