Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityMike De Decker was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 23.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Niels Zonneveld set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 9.6 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeMike De DeckerNiels Zonneveld Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionMike De DeckerCheckout %56.0%
Highest checkout90
Checkouts5/9
Niels ZonneveldCheckout %33.0%
Highest checkout104
Checkouts6/18
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Mike De Decker
L2Mike De Decker
L3Niels Zonneveld
L4Niels Zonneveld
L5Mike De Decker
L6Mike De Decker
L7Niels Zonneveld
L8Mike De Decker
L9Niels Zonneveld
L10Niels Zonneveld
L11Niels Zonneveld
Leg-by-leg table
11 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Mike De Decker
15Fast leg
90
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Mike De Decker
14Fast leg
58
Set 1 · Leg 3
Niels Zonneveld
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 2
Niels Zonneveld
15Fast leg
104
Set 1 · Leg 5
Mike De Decker
13Fast leg
8
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Mike De Decker
13Fast leg
34
Set 1 · Leg 7
Niels Zonneveld
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 8
Mike De Decker
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 9
Niels Zonneveld
17
70
Set 1 · Leg 10Streak of 2
Niels Zonneveld
12Fast leg
87
Set 1 · Leg 11Streak of 3
Niels Zonneveld
14Fast leg
54
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg91.6
First 992.7
Checkout56.0% (5/9)
180s2
High checkout90
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg92
First 9102.3
Checkout33.0% (6/18)
180s3
High checkout104
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressNiels Zonneveld closed this out 5–6, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.