Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 20 Mar 2026, 15:16 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerJason Heaver
Score2–4
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictJason Heaver won 2–4. The result was driven by a 20.0 percentage point checkout edge for Jason Heaver.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayDylan GrazierJason Heaver
77
3-dart averageDylan Grazier edge
76.7
86.9
First 9 averageDylan Grazier edge
75.4
20.0%
Checkout %Jason Heaver edge
40.0%
7
100+Dylan Grazier edge
3
2
140+Jason Heaver edge
7
1
180sDylan Grazier edge
0
75
Highest checkoutDylan Grazier edge
60
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJason Heaver was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 20.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Dylan Grazier set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 11.5 point First 9 advantage.
Heaver J. took the final leg in 20 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsHeaver J. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 20 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg77
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 2 / 7
Checkout %20.0%
Highest checkout75
Checkouts2/10
3-dart avg76.7
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 7 / 3
Checkout %40.0%
Highest checkout60
Checkouts4/10
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Heaver J.
L2Heaver J.
L3Grazier D.
L4Grazier D.
L5Heaver J.
L6Heaver J.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Heaver J.
17
60
Set 1 · Leg 2
Heaver J.
22
10
Set 1 · Leg 3
Grazier D.
17
75
Set 1 · Leg 4
Grazier D.
17
60
Set 1 · Leg 5
Heaver J.
17
58
Set 1 · Leg 6
Heaver J.
20
37
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 75
Sourcefull_leg_data