Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 20 Mar 2026, 13:28 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerJamie Lewis
Score2–4
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictJamie Lewis won 2–4. The result was driven by a 2.0 point 3-dart average edge for Jason Heaver; a 26.0 percentage point checkout edge for Jamie Lewis.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayJason HeaverJamie Lewis
85.1
3-dart averageJason Heaver edge
83.1
98.4
First 9 averageJason Heaver edge
86
18.0%
Checkout %Jamie Lewis edge
44.0%
10
100+Jason Heaver edge
8
4
140+Level
4
0
180sLevel
0
101
Highest checkoutJason Heaver edge
66
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJason Heaver created the cleaner scoring base with a 2.0 point edge in 3-dart average.
Jamie Lewis was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 26.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Jason Heaver set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 12.4 point First 9 advantage.
Lewis J. took the final leg in 16 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsLewis J. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 16 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg85.1
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 4 / 10
Checkout %18.0%
Highest checkout101
Checkouts2/11
3-dart avg83.1
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 4 / 8
Checkout %44.0%
Highest checkout66
Checkouts4/9
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Lewis J.
L2Lewis J.
L3Heaver J.
L4Lewis J.
L5Heaver J.
L6Lewis J.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Lewis J.
19
16
Set 1 · Leg 2
Lewis J.
16
36
Set 1 · Leg 3
Heaver J.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 4
Lewis J.
17
66
Set 1 · Leg 5
Heaver J.
15Fast leg
101
Set 1 · Leg 6
Lewis J.
16
32
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 67
Sourcefull_leg_data