DartsEdge

Completed Match

Full leg data

Jack Tweddell

2–4

Nathan Potter

Modus Super Series • Semifinals • 14 Mar 2026, 22:14 UTC • Best of 7 legs

WinnerNathan Potter
Score2–4
DataFull leg data

Why this match was won

Post-match verdict

Nathan Potter won 2–4. The result was driven by a 2.2 point 3-dart average edge for Nathan Potter; a 34.0 percentage point checkout edge for Jack Tweddell.

Average gap2.2 ptsNathan Potter led the 3-dart average.
Checkout gap34.0 ptsJack Tweddell finished cleaner on doubles.
Leg flowNo runNo leg-by-leg run stood out.
Pre-match edgeNo clean edgePrediction unavailable

Pre-match edge post-mortem

Prediction unavailable
No clean edge

There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.

Match comparison

One table, no stat-card cosplay
Jack TweddellNathan Potter
85.7
3-dart averageNathan Potter edge
87.9
88
First 9 averageNathan Potter edge
99.4
67.0%
Checkout %Jack Tweddell edge
33.0%
4
100+Nathan Potter edge
14
2
140+Level
2
2
180sJack Tweddell edge
1
98
Highest checkoutJack Tweddell edge
81

Key performance insights

Driven by the final stat split and leg availability
Nathan Potter created the cleaner scoring base with a 2.2 point edge in 3-dart average.
Jack Tweddell was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 34.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Nathan Potter set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 11.4 point First 9 advantage.
Potter N. took the final leg in 19 darts, closing the match at 0–0.

Leg-flow story

Runs, breaks, and decisive legs
Potter N. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 19 darts.

Scoring and finishing

Volume plus conversion
Jack Tweddell
3-dart avg85.7
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 2 / 4
Checkout %67.0%
Highest checkout98
Checkouts2/3
Nathan Potter
3-dart avg87.9
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 2 / 14
Checkout %33.0%
Highest checkout81
Checkouts4/12

Momentum strip

Match flow by leg
L1Potter N.
L2Tweddell J.
L3Tweddell J.
L4Potter N.
L5Potter N.
L6Potter N.

Leg-by-leg table

6 legs captured
LegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Potter N.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 2
Tweddell J.
15Fast leg
98
Set 1 · Leg 3
Tweddell J.
18
89
Set 1 · Leg 4
Potter N.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 5
Potter N.
12Fast leg
81
Set 1 · Leg 6
Potter N.
19
20

Data coverage

Source and completeness
CoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 65
Sourcefull_leg_data