Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 7 Mar 2026, 19:46 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerAdam Mould
Score4–1
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictAdam Mould won 4–1. The result was driven by a 2.0 point 3-dart average edge for Patrick Dekker; a 60.0 percentage point checkout edge for Adam Mould.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayAdam MouldPatrick Dekker
84.8
3-dart averagePatrick Dekker edge
86.8
88.8
First 9 averagePatrick Dekker edge
90.6
80.0%
Checkout %Adam Mould edge
20.0%
8
100+Patrick Dekker edge
10
2
140+Patrick Dekker edge
3
0
180sLevel
0
56
Highest checkoutAdam Mould edge
40
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityPatrick Dekker created the cleaner scoring base with a 2.0 point edge in 3-dart average.
Adam Mould was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 60.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Mould A. took the final leg in 16 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsMould A. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 16 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg84.8
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 2 / 8
Checkout %80.0%
Highest checkout56
Checkouts4/5
3-dart avg86.8
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 3 / 10
Checkout %20.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts1/5
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Mould A.
L2Mould A.
L3Dekker P.
L4Mould A.
L5Mould A.
Leg-by-leg table
5 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Mould A.
17
47
Set 1 · Leg 2
Mould A.
17
56
Set 1 · Leg 3
Dekker P.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 4
Mould A.
17
54
Set 1 · Leg 5
Mould A.
16
40
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits5 / 58
Sourcefull_leg_data