Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityPatrik Williams was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 5.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Patrik Williams set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 2.6 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumePatrik WilliamsCor Dekker Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionPatrik WilliamsCheckout %38.0%
Highest checkout118
Checkouts6/16
Cor DekkerCheckout %33.0%
Highest checkout56
Checkouts5/15
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Cor Dekker
L2Cor Dekker
L3Williams P.
L4Cor Dekker
L5Cor Dekker
L6Williams P.
L7Cor Dekker
L8Williams P.
L9Williams P.
L10Williams P.
L11Williams P.
Leg-by-leg table
11 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Cor Dekker
19
20
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Cor Dekker
13Fast leg
32
Set 1 · Leg 3
Williams P.
14Fast leg
56
Set 1 · Leg 4
Cor Dekker
17
56
Set 1 · Leg 5Streak of 2
Cor Dekker
14Fast leg
47
Set 1 · Leg 6
Williams P.
14Fast leg
52
Set 1 · Leg 7
Cor Dekker
16
8
Set 1 · Leg 8
Williams P.
13Fast leg
36
Set 1 · Leg 9
Williams P.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 10
Williams P.
14Fast leg
72
Set 1 · Leg 11
Williams P.
15Fast leg
118
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg88.8
First 996.4
Checkout38.0% (6/16)
180s2
High checkout118
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg89.2
First 993.8
Checkout33.0% (5/15)
180s1
High checkout56
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressPatrik Williams closed this out 6–5, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.