Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityPatrick Dekker created the cleaner scoring base with a 5.3 point edge in 3-dart average.
Martin Thomas was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 6.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumePatrick DekkerMartin Thomas Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionPatrick DekkerCheckout %44.0%
Highest checkout100
Checkouts4/9
Martin ThomasCheckout %50.0%
Highest checkout74
Checkouts2/4
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Thomas M.
L2Thomas M.
L3Dekker P.
L4Dekker P.
L5Dekker P.
L6Dekker P.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Thomas M.
16
38
Set 1 · Leg 2
Thomas M.
14Fast leg
74
Set 1 · Leg 3
Dekker P.
20
19
Set 1 · Leg 4
Dekker P.
18
100
Set 1 · Leg 5
Dekker P.
14Fast leg
66
Set 1 · Leg 6
Dekker P.
13Fast leg
36
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg86.9
First 983.6
Checkout44.0% (4/9)
180s1
High checkout100
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg81.7
First 983.6
Checkout50.0% (2/4)
180s0
High checkout74
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressPatrick Dekker closed this out 4–2, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.