Completed Match
Full leg dataModus Super Series • 5 Mar 2026, 14:05 UTC • Best of 7 legs
WinnerPatrick Dekker
Score4–2
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictPatrick Dekker won 4–2. The result was driven by a 5.3 point 3-dart average edge for Patrick Dekker; a 6.0 percentage point checkout edge for Martin Thomas.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayPatrick DekkerMartin Thomas
86.9
3-dart averagePatrick Dekker edge
81.7
83.6
First 9 averageMartin Thomas edge
83.6
44.0%
Checkout %Martin Thomas edge
50.0%
7
100+Patrick Dekker edge
3
4
140+Level
4
1
180sPatrick Dekker edge
0
100
Highest checkoutPatrick Dekker edge
74
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityPatrick Dekker created the cleaner scoring base with a 5.3 point edge in 3-dart average.
Martin Thomas was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 6.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Dekker P. took the final leg in 13 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsDekker P. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 13 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg86.9
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 4 / 7
Checkout %44.0%
Highest checkout100
Checkouts4/9
3-dart avg81.7
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 4 / 3
Checkout %50.0%
Highest checkout74
Checkouts2/4
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Thomas M.
L2Thomas M.
L3Dekker P.
L4Dekker P.
L5Dekker P.
L6Dekker P.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Thomas M.
16
38
Set 1 · Leg 2
Thomas M.
14Fast leg
74
Set 1 · Leg 3
Dekker P.
20
19
Set 1 · Leg 4
Dekker P.
18
100
Set 1 · Leg 5
Dekker P.
14Fast leg
66
Set 1 · Leg 6
Dekker P.
13Fast leg
36
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 65
Sourcefull_leg_data