Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilitySamuel Whitaker was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 13.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeSamuel WhitakerJeffrey De Zwaan Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionSamuel WhitakerCheckout %46.0%
Highest checkout121
Checkouts6/13
Jeffrey De ZwaanCheckout %33.0%
Highest checkout61
Checkouts4/12
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Whitaker S.
L2De Zwaan J.
L3De Zwaan J.
L4De Zwaan J.
L5De Zwaan J.
L6Whitaker S.
L7Whitaker S.
L8Whitaker S.
L9Whitaker S.
L10Whitaker S.
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Whitaker S.
13Fast leg
34
Set 1 · Leg 2
De Zwaan J.
17
48
Set 1 · Leg 3
De Zwaan J.
14Fast leg
61
Set 1 · Leg 4
De Zwaan J.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 5
De Zwaan J.
16
8
Set 1 · Leg 6
Whitaker S.
15Fast leg
90
Set 1 · Leg 7
Whitaker S.
15Fast leg
100
Set 1 · Leg 8
Whitaker S.
12Fast leg
121
Set 1 · Leg 9
Whitaker S.
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 10
Whitaker S.
12Fast leg
81
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg95.2
First 9103.7
Checkout46.0% (6/13)
180s2
High checkout121
100+ checkouts2
3-dart avg95.9
First 9102.6
Checkout33.0% (4/12)
180s3
High checkout61
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressSamuel Whitaker closed this out 6–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.