Completed Match
Full leg dataUK Open 2026 • Round 2 • 6 Mar 2026, 13:56 UTC • Best of 11 legs
WinnerJim Long
Score0–6
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictJim Long won 0–6. The result was driven by a 7.8 point 3-dart average edge for Jim Long; a 55.0 percentage point checkout edge for Jim Long.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayTytus KanikJim Long
72
3-dart averageJim Long edge
79.8
79.1
First 9 averageJim Long edge
88.1
0.0%
Checkout %Jim Long edge
55.0%
4
100+Tytus Kanik edge
3
2
140+Jim Long edge
8
1
180sTytus Kanik edge
0
0
Highest checkoutJim Long edge
81
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJim Long created the cleaner scoring base with a 7.8 point edge in 3-dart average.
Jim Long was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 55.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Jim Long set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 9.0 point First 9 advantage.
Long J. took the final leg in 18 darts, closing the match at 0–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsLong J. closed the final leg at 0–0 in 18 darts.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg72
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 2 / 4
Checkout %0.0%
Highest checkout0
Checkouts0/12
3-dart avg79.8
180s / 140+ / 100+0 / 8 / 3
Checkout %55.0%
Highest checkout81
Checkouts6/11
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Long J.
L2Long J.
L3Long J.
L4Long J.
L5Long J.
L6Long J.
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Long J.
19
40
Set 1 · Leg 2
Long J.
17
56
Set 1 · Leg 3
Long J.
17
78
Set 1 · Leg 4
Long J.
20
75
Set 1 · Leg 5
Long J.
19
18
Set 1 · Leg 6
Long J.
18
81
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits6 / 75
Sourcefull_leg_data