Why this match was won
Post-match verdictDan Read won 2–4. The result was driven by a 22.3 point 3-dart average edge for Dan Read; a 28.0 percentage point checkout edge for Dan Read.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayGino VosDan Read
77.8
3-dart averageDan Read edge
100
22.0%
Checkout %Dan Read edge
50.0%
5
100+Gino Vos edge
4
1
140+Dan Read edge
6
1
180sDan Read edge
2
32
Highest checkoutDan Read edge
72
Performance insights
Driven by match-level stats onlyDan Read created the cleaner scoring base with a 22.3 point edge in 3-dart average.
Dan Read was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 28.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg77.8
180s / 140+ / 100+1 / 1 / 5
Checkout %22.0%
Highest checkout32
3-dart avg100
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 6 / 4
Checkout %50.0%
Highest checkout72
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoveragepoint-by-point unavailable
Stats rows2
Legs / visits0 / 0
Sourcematch_stats_only
point-by-point unavailable
