180s0
140+3
100+9
Completed Match
Full breakdown modeModus Super Series • 15 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC • Best of 5 legs
WinnerLorraine Hyde
Score3–2
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Awaiting recap signalThis match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.
Edge result
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitLorraine Hyde avg70.8
Kirsi Viinikainen avg64.4
Lorraine Hyde checkout16.0%
Kirsi Viinikainen checkout22.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedLorraine HydeKirsi Viinikainen
70.8
3-dart averageLorraine Hyde edge
64.4
78.1
First 9 averageLorraine Hyde edge
60.9
16.0%
Checkout %Kirsi Viinikainen edge
22.0%
9
100+Lorraine Hyde edge
5
3
140+Lorraine Hyde edge
2
0
180sLevel
0
60
Highest checkoutLevel
60
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityLorraine Hyde created the cleaner scoring base with a 6.4 point edge in 3-dart average.
Kirsi Viinikainen was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 6.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Lorraine Hyde set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 17.2 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s0
140+2
100+5
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %16.0%
Highest checkout60
Checkouts3/19
Checkout %22.0%
Highest checkout60
Checkouts2/9
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Hyde L.
L2Viinikainen K.
L3Hyde L.
L4Viinikainen K.
L5Hyde L.
Leg-by-leg table
5 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Leg 1
Hyde L.
20
60
Leg 2
Viinikainen K.
29
5
Leg 3
Hyde L.
20
56
Leg 4
Viinikainen K.
23
60
Leg 5
Hyde L.
16
40
Match stats
2 player rowsHyde L.
3-dart avg70.8
First 978.1
Checkout16.0% (3/19)
180s0
High checkout60
100+ checkouts0
Viinikainen K.
3-dart avg64.4
First 960.9
Checkout22.0% (2/9)
180s0
High checkout60
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressLorraine Hyde closed this out 3–2, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.