Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityRoy van de Griendt was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 17.5 percentage points better on doubles.
Danny Tessmann set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 11.0 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeRoy van de GriendtDanny Tessmann Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionRoy van de GriendtCheckout %30.0%
Highest checkout74
Checkouts6/20
Danny TessmannCheckout %12.5%
Highest checkout43
Checkouts3/24
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1van de Griendt R.
L2Tessmann D.
L3van de Griendt R.
L4Tessmann D.
L5van de Griendt R.
L6Tessmann D.
L7van de Griendt R.
L8van de Griendt R.
L9van de Griendt R.
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Leg 1
van de Griendt R.
25
4
Leg 3
van de Griendt R.
19
10
Leg 5
van de Griendt R.
14Fast leg
74
Leg 7
van de Griendt R.
14Fast leg
68
Leg 8
van de Griendt R.
19
20
Leg 9
van de Griendt R.
16
24
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg78.4
First 983.1
Checkout30.0% (6/20)
180s0
High checkout74
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg77.6
First 994.2
Checkout12.5% (3/24)
180s2
High checkout43
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressRoy van de Griendt closed this out 6–3, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.