Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityFilip Sebesta was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 50.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Raymond van Barneveld set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 11.3 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeRaymond van BarneveldFilip Sebesta Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionRaymond van BarneveldCheckout %50.0%
Highest checkout87
Checkouts6/12
Filip SebestaCheckout %100.0%
Highest checkout121
Checkouts3/3
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Raymond van Barneveld
L2Sebesta F.
L3Raymond van Barneveld
L4Raymond van Barneveld
L5Raymond van Barneveld
L6Sebesta F.
L7Raymond van Barneveld
L8Sebesta F.
L9Raymond van Barneveld
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Leg 1
Raymond van Barneveld
17
56
Leg 3
Raymond van Barneveld
13Fast leg
50
Leg 4Streak of 2
Raymond van Barneveld
14Fast leg
56
Leg 5Streak of 3
Raymond van Barneveld
13Fast leg
40
Leg 6
Sebesta F.
14Fast leg
41
Leg 7
Raymond van Barneveld
13Fast leg
20
Leg 8
Sebesta F.
12Fast leg
121
Leg 9
Raymond van Barneveld
15Fast leg
87
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg98.7
First 9110
Checkout50.0% (6/12)
180s2
High checkout87
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg98.6
First 998.7
Checkout100.0% (3/3)
180s2
High checkout121
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressRaymond van Barneveld closed this out 6–3, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.