180s1
140+2
100+7
Completed Match
Full breakdown modeWorld Seniors Championship 2025 • T32 • 19 Feb 2025, 00:00 UTC • Best of 11 sets
WinnerJohn Part
Score3–1
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Awaiting recap signalThis match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.
Edge result
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitJim McEwan avg80.4
John Part avg84
Jim McEwan checkout32.0%
John Part checkout38.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedJim McEwanJohn Part
80.4
3-dart averageJohn Part edge
84
82.3
First 9 averageJohn Part edge
93.8
32.0%
Checkout %John Part edge
38.0%
7
100+Level
7
2
140+John Part edge
4
1
180sLevel
1
140
Highest checkoutJim McEwan edge
8
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJohn Part created the cleaner scoring base with a 3.7 point edge in 3-dart average.
John Part was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 6.0 percentage points better on doubles.
John Part set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 11.4 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s1
140+4
100+7
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %32.0%
Highest checkout140
Checkouts8/25
Checkout %38.0%
Highest checkout8
Checkouts12/32
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1John Part
L2Jim McEwan
L3Jim McEwan
L4Jim McEwan
Leg-by-leg table
4 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
John Part
19
8
Set 1 · Leg 2
Jim McEwan
12Fast leg
140
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 2
Jim McEwan
20
56
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 3
Jim McEwan
14Fast leg
62
Match stats
2 player rowsJim McEwan
3-dart avg80.4
First 982.3
Checkout32.0% (8/25)
180s1
High checkout140
100+ checkouts1
John Part
3-dart avg84
First 993.8
Checkout38.0% (12/32)
180s1
High checkout8
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressJohn Part closed this out 3–1, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.