Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJohn Haines created the cleaner scoring base with a 1.1 point edge in 3-dart average.
John Haines was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 21.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeJitse Van der WalJohn Haines Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionJitse Van der WalCheckout %25.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts3/12
John HainesCheckout %46.0%
Highest checkout116
Checkouts6/13
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1John Haines
L2Jitse Van der Wal
L3John Haines
L4John Haines
L5John Haines
L6Jitse Van der Wal
L7Jitse Van der Wal
L8John Haines
L9John Haines
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
John Haines
17
57
Set 1 · Leg 2
Jitse Van der Wal
13Fast leg
24
Set 1 · Leg 3
John Haines
13Fast leg
24
Set 1 · Leg 4Streak of 2
John Haines
15Fast leg
95
Set 1 · Leg 5Streak of 3
John Haines
13Fast leg
40
Set 1 · Leg 6
Jitse Van der Wal
16
12
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 2
Jitse Van der Wal
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 8
John Haines
15Fast leg
116
Set 1 · Leg 9Streak of 2
John Haines
14Fast leg
52
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg94.6
First 9102.6
Checkout25.0% (3/12)
180s3
High checkout40
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg95.6
First 9100.7
Checkout46.0% (6/13)
180s3
High checkout116
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressJohn Haines closed this out 3–6, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.