Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityDaniel Klose created the cleaner scoring base with a 1.9 point edge in 3-dart average.
Mike De Decker was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 20.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeMike De DeckerDaniel Klose Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionMike De DeckerCheckout %43.0%
Highest checkout75
Checkouts6/14
Daniel KloseCheckout %23.0%
Highest checkout40
Checkouts3/13
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Klose D.
L2Mike De Decker
L3Mike De Decker
L4Klose D.
L5Mike De Decker
L6Klose D.
L7Mike De Decker
L8Mike De Decker
L9Mike De Decker
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Klose D.
19
16
Set 1 · Leg 2
Mike De Decker
16
24
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 2
Mike De Decker
17
56
Set 1 · Leg 4
Klose D.
16
40
Set 1 · Leg 5
Mike De Decker
17
60
Set 1 · Leg 6
Klose D.
16
32
Set 1 · Leg 7
Mike De Decker
16
16
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 2
Mike De Decker
14Fast leg
75
Set 1 · Leg 9Streak of 3
Mike De Decker
13Fast leg
40
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg89.9
First 995.7
Checkout43.0% (6/14)
180s0
High checkout75
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg91.9
First 994.8
Checkout23.0% (3/13)
180s2
High checkout40
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressMike De Decker closed this out 6–3, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.