Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityvan der Velde was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 11.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Mario Vandenbogaerde set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 7.6 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeMario Vandenbogaerdevan der Velde Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionMario VandenbogaerdeCheckout %29.0%
Highest checkout112
Checkouts4/14
van der VeldeCheckout %40.0%
Highest checkout112
Checkouts6/15
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1van der Velde
L2van der Velde
L3Vandenbogaerde
L4van der Velde
L5Vandenbogaerde
L6van der Velde
L7Vandenbogaerde
L8Vandenbogaerde
L9Vandenbogaerde
L10Vandenbogaerde
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
van der Velde
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
van der Velde
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 3
Vandenbogaerde
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 4
van der Velde
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5
Vandenbogaerde
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 6
van der Velde
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7
Vandenbogaerde
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 8
Vandenbogaerde
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 9
Vandenbogaerde
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 10
Vandenbogaerde
—
—
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg92
First 9100.9
Checkout29.0% (4/14)
180s1
High checkout112
100+ checkouts1
3-dart avg92.1
First 993.3
Checkout40.0% (6/15)
180s1
High checkout112
100+ checkouts1
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressMario Vandenbogaerde closed this out 6–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.