Completed Match
Full leg dataPlayers Championship 26 • T64 • 19 Oct 2023, 00:00 UTC • Best of 15 legs
WinnerChris Landman
Score1–6
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictChris Landman won 1–6. The result was driven by a 14.6 point 3-dart average edge for Chris Landman; a 33.0 percentage point checkout edge for Smith.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplaySmithChris Landman
75.8
3-dart averageChris Landman edge
90.4
106.6
First 9 averageSmith edge
84.5
46.0%
Checkout %Smith edge
13.0%
25
100+Level
25
7
140+Level
7
2
180sLevel
2
81
Highest checkoutLevel
81
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityChris Landman created the cleaner scoring base with a 14.6 point edge in 3-dart average.
Smith was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 33.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Smith set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 22.1 point First 9 advantage.
Landman took the final leg, closing the match at 1–0.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsLandman closed the final leg at 1–0.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg75.8
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 7 / 25
Checkout %46.0%
Highest checkout81
Checkouts6/13
3-dart avg90.4
180s / 140+ / 100+2 / 7 / 25
Checkout %13.0%
Highest checkout81
Checkouts1/8
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Landman
L2Landman
L3Landman
L4Landman
L5Landman
L6Smith
L7Landman
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Landman
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 2
Landman
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 3
Landman
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 4
Landman
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5
Landman
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 6
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7
Landman
—
—
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits7 / 76
Sourceexplicit
