180s6
140+27
100+44
Completed Match
Full breakdown modePlayers Championship 26 • T32 • 19 Oct 2023, 00:00 UTC • Best of 15 legs
WinnerDe Sousa
Score6–4
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Awaiting recap signalThis match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.
Edge result
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitDe Sousa avg101.2
Scott Williams avg106.3
De Sousa checkout44.0%
Scott Williams checkout75.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedDe SousaScott Williams
101.2
3-dart averageScott Williams edge
106.3
114.2
First 9 averageDe Sousa edge
103.9
44.0%
Checkout %Scott Williams edge
75.0%
44
100+Level
44
27
140+Level
27
6
180sLevel
6
142
Highest checkoutLevel
142
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityScott Williams created the cleaner scoring base with a 5.0 point edge in 3-dart average.
Scott Williams was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 31.0 percentage points better on doubles.
De Sousa set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 10.3 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s6
140+27
100+44
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %44.0%
Highest checkout142
Checkouts4/9
Checkout %75.0%
Highest checkout142
Checkouts6/8
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1De Sousa
L2Williams
L3De Sousa
L4Williams
L5Williams
L6Williams
L7De Sousa
L8De Sousa
L9De Sousa
L10De Sousa
Leg-by-leg table
10 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
De Sousa
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 2
Williams
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 3
De Sousa
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 4
Williams
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5
Williams
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 6
Williams
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7
De Sousa
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 2
De Sousa
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 9Streak of 3
De Sousa
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 10Streak of 4
De Sousa
—
—
Match stats
2 player rowsAI edge post-mortem
Work in progressDe Sousa closed this out 6–4, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.