180s1
140+11
100+25
Completed Match
Full breakdown modePlayers Championship 25 • T128 • 18 Oct 2023, 00:00 UTC • Best of 15 legs
WinnerJamie Clark
Score0–6
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Awaiting recap signalThis match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.
Edge result
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitvan Barneveld avg76.7
Jamie Clark avg92
van Barneveld checkout46.0%
Jamie Clark checkout0.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedvan BarneveldJamie Clark
76.7
3-dart averageJamie Clark edge
92
102.2
First 9 averagevan Barneveld edge
77.8
46.0%
Checkout %van Barneveld edge
0.0%
25
100+Level
25
11
140+Level
11
1
180sLevel
1
64
Highest checkoutLevel
64
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityJamie Clark created the cleaner scoring base with a 15.3 point edge in 3-dart average.
van Barneveld was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 46.0 percentage points better on doubles.
van Barneveld set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 24.3 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s1
140+11
100+25
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %46.0%
Highest checkout64
Checkouts6/13
Checkout %0.0%
Highest checkout64
Checkouts0/6
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Clark
L2Clark
L3Clark
L4Clark
L5Clark
L6Clark
Leg-by-leg table
6 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Clark
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 2
Clark
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 3
Clark
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 4
Clark
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5
Clark
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 6
Clark
—
—
Match stats
2 player rowsvan Barneveld
3-dart avg76.7
First 9102.2
Checkout46.0% (6/13)
180s1
High checkout64
100+ checkouts0
Clark
3-dart avg92
First 977.8
Checkout0.0% (0/6)
180s1
High checkout64
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressJamie Clark closed this out 0–6, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.