Why this match was won
Post-match verdictSmith won 6–1. The result was driven by a 21.9 point 3-dart average edge for Smith; a 29.0 percentage point checkout edge for Smith; the longest leg run belonging to Smith at 4 legs.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplaySmithvan Trijp
104.6
3-dart averageSmith edge
82.7
119
First 9 averageSmith edge
88.2
46.0%
Checkout %Smith edge
17.0%
29
100+Level
29
10
140+Level
10
4
180sLevel
4
96
Highest checkoutLevel
96
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilitySmith created the cleaner scoring base with a 21.9 point edge in 3-dart average.
Smith was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 29.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Smith set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 30.8 point First 9 advantage.
Smith took the final leg, closing the match at 6–1.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsSmith produced the longest run of the match with 4 legs in a row.
Smith closed the final leg at 6–1.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg104.6
180s / 140+ / 100+4 / 10 / 29
Checkout %46.0%
Highest checkout96
Checkouts6/13
3-dart avg82.7
180s / 140+ / 100+4 / 10 / 29
Checkout %17.0%
Highest checkout96
Checkouts1/6
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Smith
L2Smith
L3van Trijp
L4Smith
L5Smith
L6Smith
L7Smith
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 2Streak of 2
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 3
van Trijp
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 4
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5Streak of 2
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 3
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 4
Smith
—
—
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits7 / 70
Sourceexplicit
