Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityvan Barneveld was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 13.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeFinishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionvan BarneveldCheckout %40.0%
Highest checkout89
Checkouts6/15
Adam GawlasCheckout %27.0%
Highest checkout89
Checkouts3/11
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Gawlas
L2Gawlas
L3van Barneveld
L4Gawlas
L5Gawlas
L6Gawlas
L7van Barneveld
L8van Barneveld
L9Gawlas
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 3
van Barneveld
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7
van Barneveld
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 2
van Barneveld
—
—
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg88.4
First 997.2
Checkout40.0% (6/15)
180s3
High checkout89
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg88.7
First 996.7
Checkout27.0% (3/11)
180s3
High checkout89
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressAdam Gawlas closed this out 3–6, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.