Why this match was won
Post-match verdictSmith won 6–3. The result was driven by a 2.9 point 3-dart average edge for Smith; a 11.0 percentage point checkout edge for Smith; the longest leg run belonging to Smith at 2 legs.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplaySmithvan Trijp
85.4
3-dart averageSmith edge
82.5
92.5
First 9 averageSmith edge
82.7
38.0%
Checkout %Smith edge
27.0%
35
100+Level
35
15
140+Level
15
3
180sLevel
3
170
Highest checkoutLevel
170
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilitySmith created the cleaner scoring base with a 2.9 point edge in 3-dart average.
Smith was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 11.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Smith set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 9.7 point First 9 advantage.
Smith took the final leg, closing the match at 6–3.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsSmith produced the longest run of the match with 2 legs in a row.
Smith closed the final leg at 6–3.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg85.4
180s / 140+ / 100+3 / 15 / 35
Checkout %38.0%
Highest checkout170
Checkouts6/16
3-dart avg82.5
180s / 140+ / 100+3 / 15 / 35
Checkout %27.0%
Highest checkout170
Checkouts3/11
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1van Trijp
L2Smith
L3Smith
L4van Trijp
L5Smith
L6Smith
L7van Trijp
L8Smith
L9Smith
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
van Trijp
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 2
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 2
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 4
van Trijp
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 6Streak of 2
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7
van Trijp
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 8
Smith
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 9Streak of 2
Smith
—
—
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits9 / 103
Sourceexplicit
