Completed Match

Full breakdown mode

James Wade

6–0

van Trijp

Players Championship 22 • T128 • 27 Sept 2023, 00:00 UTC • Best of 15 legs

WinnerJames Wade
Score6–0
ModeFull breakdown

AI match summary

Awaiting recap signal

This match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.

Edge result

Prediction unavailable
No clean edge

There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.

Player performance comparison

Final stat split
James Wade avg99.1
van Trijp avg78.7
James Wade checkout55.0%
van Trijp checkout0.0%

Core match stats

Better values highlighted
James Wadevan Trijp
99.1
3-dart averageJames Wade edge
78.7
107.1
First 9 averageJames Wade edge
81.7
55.0%
Checkout %James Wade edge
0.0%
22
100+Level
22
10
140+Level
10
2
180sLevel
2
91
Highest checkoutLevel
91

Key performance insights

Driven by the final stat split and leg availability
James Wade created the cleaner scoring base with a 20.4 point edge in 3-dart average.
James Wade was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 55.0 percentage points better on doubles.
James Wade set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 25.4 point First 9 advantage.

Scoring summary

Power scoring and volume
James Wade
180s2
140+10
100+22
van Trijp
180s2
140+10
100+22

Finishing summary

Checkout quality and conversion
James Wade
Checkout %55.0%
Highest checkout91
Checkouts6/11
van Trijp
Checkout %0.0%
Highest checkout91
Checkouts0/4

Momentum strip

Match flow by leg
L1Wade
L2Wade
L3Wade
L4Wade
L5Wade
L6Wade

Leg-by-leg table

6 legs captured
LegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Wade
Set 1 · Leg 2
Wade
Set 1 · Leg 3
Wade
Set 1 · Leg 4
Wade
Set 1 · Leg 5
Wade
Set 1 · Leg 6
Wade

Match stats

2 player rows

Wade

3-dart avg99.1
First 9107.1
Checkout55.0% (6/11)
180s2
High checkout91
100+ checkouts0

van Trijp

3-dart avg78.7
First 981.7
Checkout0.0% (0/4)
180s2
High checkout91
100+ checkouts0

AI edge post-mortem

Work in progress

James Wade closed this out 6–0, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.