180s2
140+13
100+51
Completed Match
Full breakdown modePlayers Championship 22 • T128 • 27 Sept 2023, 00:00 UTC • Best of 15 legs
WinnerScott Williams
Score5–6
ModeFull breakdown
AI match summary
Awaiting recap signalThis match page now supports a dedicated completed-match recap path, but the post-match summary signal is not populated for this one yet.
Edge result
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There is not enough structured preview output here yet to judge whether the pre-match edge landed.
Player performance comparison
Final stat splitVladimir Andersen avg86
Scott Williams avg86.8
Vladimir Andersen checkout25.0%
Scott Williams checkout32.0%
Core match stats
Better values highlightedVladimir AndersenScott Williams
86
3-dart averageScott Williams edge
86.8
98.1
First 9 averageVladimir Andersen edge
94.9
25.0%
Checkout %Scott Williams edge
32.0%
51
100+Level
51
13
140+Level
13
2
180sLevel
2
60
Highest checkoutLevel
60
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityScott Williams was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 7.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Vladimir Andersen set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 3.2 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volume180s2
140+13
100+51
Finishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionCheckout %25.0%
Highest checkout60
Checkouts5/20
Checkout %32.0%
Highest checkout60
Checkouts6/19
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1Andersen
L2Andersen
L3Williams
L4Andersen
L5Williams
L6Andersen
L7Williams
L8Andersen
L9Williams
L10Williams
L11Williams
Leg-by-leg table
11 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
Andersen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 2
Andersen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 3
Williams
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 4
Andersen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5
Williams
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 6
Andersen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7
Williams
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 8
Andersen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 9
Williams
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 10
Williams
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 11
Williams
—
—
Match stats
2 player rowsAI edge post-mortem
Work in progressScott Williams closed this out 5–6, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.