Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityvan Gerwen was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 30.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeFinishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionvan GerwenCheckout %60.0%
Highest checkout87
Checkouts6/10
Ryan MeikleCheckout %30.0%
Highest checkout87
Checkouts3/10
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1van Gerwen
L2Meikle
L3Meikle
L4van Gerwen
L5van Gerwen
L6Meikle
L7van Gerwen
L8van Gerwen
L9van Gerwen
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
van Gerwen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 4
van Gerwen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5Streak of 2
van Gerwen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7
van Gerwen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 2
van Gerwen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 9Streak of 3
van Gerwen
—
—
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg100.9
First 9109.7
Checkout60.0% (6/10)
180s4
High checkout87
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg100.8
First 9108.1
Checkout30.0% (3/10)
180s4
High checkout87
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressvan Gerwen closed this out 6–3, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.