Completed Match
Full leg dataPlayers Championship 21 • T128 • 5 Sept 2023, 00:00 UTC • Best of 15 legs
WinnerLuke Humphries
Score6–1
DataFull leg data
Why this match was won
Post-match verdictLuke Humphries won 6–1. The result was driven by a 9.5 point 3-dart average edge for Luke Humphries; a 33.0 percentage point checkout edge for Luke Humphries.
Pre-match edge post-mortem
Prediction unavailableNo clean edge
There was no clean structured pre-match edge to grade here. The useful read is the actual performance split and leg flow, not retrofitting a prediction after the fact.
Match comparison
One table, no stat-card cosplayLuke HumphriesDe Zwaan
97.1
3-dart averageLuke Humphries edge
87.6
102.2
First 9 averageLuke Humphries edge
91.6
46.0%
Checkout %Luke Humphries edge
13.0%
27
100+Level
27
12
140+Level
12
4
180sLevel
4
80
Highest checkoutLevel
80
Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityLuke Humphries created the cleaner scoring base with a 9.5 point edge in 3-dart average.
Luke Humphries was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 33.0 percentage points better on doubles.
Luke Humphries set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 10.6 point First 9 advantage.
Humphries took the final leg, closing the match at 0–1.
Leg-flow story
Runs, breaks, and decisive legsHumphries closed the final leg at 0–1.
Scoring and finishing
Volume plus conversion3-dart avg97.1
180s / 140+ / 100+4 / 12 / 27
Checkout %46.0%
Highest checkout80
Checkouts6/13
3-dart avg87.6
180s / 140+ / 100+4 / 12 / 27
Checkout %13.0%
Highest checkout80
Checkouts1/8
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1De Zwaan
L2Humphries
L3Humphries
L4Humphries
L5Humphries
L6Humphries
L7Humphries
Leg-by-leg table
7 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 1
De Zwaan
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 2
Humphries
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 3
Humphries
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 4
Humphries
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5
Humphries
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 6
Humphries
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7
Humphries
—
—
Data coverage
Source and completenessCoverageFull leg data
Stats rows2
Legs / visits7 / 73
Sourceexplicit
