Key performance insights
Driven by the final stat split and leg availabilityvan Dongen was the sharper finisher, clearing chances 10.0 percentage points better on doubles.
van Dongen set the tone earlier in legs, opening with a 13.9 point First 9 advantage.
Scoring summary
Power scoring and volumeFinishing summary
Checkout quality and conversionvan DongenCheckout %33.0%
Highest checkout70
Checkouts6/18
van PeerCheckout %23.0%
Highest checkout70
Checkouts3/13
Momentum strip
Match flow by legL1van Peer
L2van Dongen
L3van Dongen
L4van Peer
L5van Peer
L6van Dongen
L7van Dongen
L8van Dongen
L9van Dongen
Leg-by-leg table
9 legs capturedLegWinnerDartsCheckout
Set 1 · Leg 2
van Dongen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 3Streak of 2
van Dongen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 5Streak of 2
van Peer
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 6
van Dongen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 7Streak of 2
van Dongen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 8Streak of 3
van Dongen
—
—
Set 1 · Leg 9Streak of 4
van Dongen
—
—
Match stats
2 player rows3-dart avg87.9
First 9106.3
Checkout33.0% (6/18)
180s3
High checkout70
100+ checkouts0
3-dart avg87.3
First 992.4
Checkout23.0% (3/13)
180s3
High checkout70
100+ checkouts0
AI edge post-mortem
Work in progressvan Dongen closed this out 6–3, and the completed-match recap now has the right scaffolding to explain the result with more than a shrug.